Go Set A Watchman

by Harper Lee

A Review

watchman

‘It had never occurred to Jean Louise that she was a girl: her life had been one of reckless pummeling activity . . . she must now go into a world of femininity, a world she despised.’

On December 1, 1955, Rosa Parks, a black woman in Montgomery, Alabama refused to give up her bus seat to a white passenger. The event sparked a year-long boycott of the city’s buses and led the way towards fairer civil rights.

I am often confused by American politics  – and sometmes irritated too, I have to confess – yet surely only the most ostrich-headed of my fellow Britons can have failed to hear the story of Rosa Parks.

Racial tension had simmered in the Southern United States for a long time. An organisation called the NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colo[u]red people) had been active in the US for nearly half a century and were responsible for bringing several cases of injustice to the attention of the Supreme Court, which had ruled against Southern States’ laws in some landmark actions. In 1944, it had ruled in Smith v Albright that ‘white primaries’, voting arrangements that excluded black people, were illegal and in 1954 it ruled against racial segregation in primary schools. In 1956, Alabama banned the NAACP from operating within its borders, a state of affairs which prevailed for a further two years

It must have been around the time of the Rosa Parks incident that Harper Lee began writing Go Set A Watchman, and it seems to me some understanding of  the historical background is essential to a full appreciation of the novel.

Twenty-six-year-old Jean Louise Finch returns home to Maycomb, Alabama, on vacation. It is her fifth such visit since moving to New York but we already suspect this visit is going to be different. Whereas she has previously travelled by air, this time she takes the train, which gives a whole new perspective to the isolation of her home town.

‘Maycomb County was so cut off from the rest of the nation that some of its citizens, unaware of the South’s political predilections over the past ninety years, still voted Republican.’

Maycomb may not truly have changed so much but Jean Louise begins to see it with fresh eyes. People are different. Her lawyer father, Atticus, whom she has always looked up to and adored, has become chairman of the Maycomb Citizen’s Council, an apparently racist organisation devoted to preserving segregation. Calpurnia, the black housekeeper who brought her up when her mother died young, appears to be treating her more as a stranger. Even her childhood sweetheart, Henry Clinton, Jean Louise no longer sees in quite the same way as before. Bitter about her father’s apparent transformation from champion of justice to racist, she pours out her feelings of disgust and betrayal to her uncle, who does his best to set the record straight.

‘There was nothing whatever wrong with [the Rev.] Mr Stone, except that he possessed all the necessary qualifications for an accountant: he did not like people, he was quick with numbers; he had no sense of humour and he was butt-headed.’

watchmanJean Louise’s childhood and youthful memories of how things were, both charming and funny, form a considerable part of the book, as Harper Lee portrays her as tomboy, embarrassed teenager on her first date,  still mischievous undergraduate, and as a woman coming of age to realise the world is as it is – not as she would like it to be. Though life and love will never be the same again, Jean Louise reaches an understanding, an acceptance and a realisation that real change only comes about by real effort, not by wishful thinking.

‘ “Jean Louise,” [Dr Finch] said dryly, “not much more than five per cent of the South’s population ever saw a slave, much less owned one. Now, something must have irritated the other ninety-five per cent.” ‘

Go Set A Watchman is a bitter-sweet novel about race and class, one that has as much relevance today as when it was written sixty years ago. There are some minor discontinuities in the narrative – the divisions between the NOW and the THEN are not always clearly defined, – nevertheless I think the work establishes Harper Lee as one of the outstanding writers of last century. I feel sure that Jean Louise’s life journey is Harper Lee’s journey too, one that most of us make at one time or another in our lives. It is not always a comfortable experience to discover that, perhaps, we are all bigots, each in our own way, and it’s not always a matter of skin colour.

I know that critics have compared Go Set A Watchman with Lee’s Pulitzer Prize-winning To Kill A Mockingbird, not always favourably. However, I was determined to pay the critics no attention and to read no reviews until I had read (and reviewed) the novel for myself. Having now done so, I regard such comparisons as contrived and pointless, as much about lingering doubts over the worth of the latter novel as about the quality of the former. One might as well compare apples and oranges.

The other day, someone who has not read To Kill A Mockingbird asked me which novel they ought to read first. Honestly, I have no idea – why not toss a coin?

I’ll now go and read some of those other reviews.

*****

 

Advertisements

8 thoughts on “Go Set A Watchman

    1. Thanks for reading and commenting, TJ. I find myself wondering why anyone would place any value on opinions about a book BEFORE it was published. But as you say, people did express them.

  1. Nan Johnson

    Bravo for reading the book first! Great review. I agree that distinctions between real-time action and Jean Louise’s recollections were cloudy at times. Also, I noticed some minor violations by today’s “writing rules,” but forgave them because I thought the book was engaging overall.

    You described the book as “a bitter-sweet novel about race and class.” While I agree with the “bitter-sweet” part, I didn’t see the book as much about race and class as about the turmoil of a young woman entering, and accepting, adulthood. Jean Louise wrestles with many issues on her visit home: she argues with her aunt about decent behavior in women; she’s both bored and enraged by the small talk of the coffee ladies; Sunday school offers nothing; her hometown is stifling, and so on. She’s critical of, cynical about, or angry with just about everyone and everything – typical of young adults who fear they will lose their idealism and turn out just like the older generation. I wish we could ask Harper Lee if she meant to specifically address race, or if it was the most volatile issue that divided generations and would best show the complicated relationship between parents and their emerging-adult children. Atticus’s respond to Jean Louise saying, “I despise you and everything you stand for” was “Well, I love you.” I felt that was what the book was about.

    1. Hi Nan – great to hear from you on this forum, and thanks so much for visiting and reading. Yes, you’re absolutely right about the ‘turmoil’. I tried to address that in a way by my ‘coming of age’ comment further on. The problem with that idea is that JLF should have come of age a long time ago (?). Indeed, I seem to recollect that someone somewhere referred to TKAM as a coming-of-age novel.
      I think there’s a lot more in GSAW than is suggested in many of the initial newspaper/magazine reviews. {Oh gosh, Atticus is a racist – my illusions are shattered!} There are so many questions I would like to ask Harper Lee.

      1. Nan Johnson

        I agree! I’d love to chat with her.
        Perhaps both of her novels can be “coming of age” stories if we use the term loosely, meaning that there are many stages in life’s journey when we gain insight that moves us toward wisdom. Through Jean Louise, Harper Lee reveals concerns young women wrestle with in every generation: What is my place in this crazy, mixed-up world? If I marry, will I disappear? How do I fit in and still be true to myself? Will my life be significant? Different questions from those in TKAM. Harper Lee allows both Scout and Jean Louise to “grow up” in different ways in each novel.
        I enjoy reading your book reviews, Andrew.

  2. I don’t think it matters which they read first – though it would be interesting to see how much they like or dislike Watchman if they haven’t first read Mockingbird. But really, it is pointless to compare they two books, because Watchman is not a sequel to Mockingbird. It is, essentially the same novel, just, changed, and improved.

  3. I agree comparisons are not really useful. I do wonder (one of my many questions) what the result would have been if HL had continued editing and improving GSAW instead of taking the publisher’s advice (as I understand she did) and writing a ‘different’ story. Mightn’t she have got a Pulitzer anyway?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s